DVD Movies – New Release – DVDmovies4you.com – Download top old and new movies on dvd or blu-ray dvd – HD Quality

Download Phantoms

Buy Phantoms dvd movie – 23 January 1998 release date – 1998 year – ratings: 5.2

Phantoms poster

Stars: Peter O'Toole, Rose McGowan, Joanna Going

Country: USA, Japan

Runtime: 96 min

Storyline: In the peaceful town of Snowfield, Colorado something evil has wiped out the community. And now, its up to a group of people to stop it, or at least get out of Snowfield alive.

Torrents:

T

5 comments on Download Phantoms

  1. Luella
    May 19, 2013 at 5:54 am (472 days ago)

    I must admit that I am a big fan of Dean Koontz, perhaps more than I’m Stephen King. And although Koontz years imitated king. GHOSTS, which is the variation of the King and Koontz IT also contains buttons to John Carpenter’s the thing, starting with most of the population of a small mountain village of dead or missing. A young doctor (Joanna Going) and younger sister (Rose McGowan) arrived in the city in the worst possible time, but soon they connect with the local sheriff (Ben Affleck) and his deputy (Liev Schreiber and Nicky Katt) . The city is backed by an elemental force dozing in the bowels of the earth for untold millennia. Now he wants out. A scientist (Peter O’Toole) and military arrive early, but can not stop it. Change primary right guard on the uptake and killing people. This modest horror film, shot in beautiful Colorado, is creepy and atmospheric, and should not be looked at alone, especially at night, unless you enjoy having nightmares. Affleck is a bit ‘young to be a sheriff, but hey, what do I know? Schreiber is scary, from the beginning, and only becomes more self-effacing film. The gore is enough for a low-budget effort, the final confrontation with the monster is surprisingly satisfying. I look at this little monster movies ordered whenever I can.

  2. Esmeralda
    May 19, 2013 at 5:54 am (472 days ago)

    Many people have seen this film as a box full of shower that is ready to be absorbed into your system at any time. But the sky is … I beg to differ. This is not a bad idea after all FANTASY. Dean Koontz, yes, it is almost the basis of an argument. Books should be out on the shelf next to The Shining, Fahrenheit 451, Man in the High Castle, et cetera. And the films should be left with the … I do not have to tell you this. The location and setting of the cameras are not very impressive, and sound-recording and effects. Some Throughout the film, you could feel the city. Well, to each his own. You have to watch the movie to understand. But this is just my opinion.
    Do not believe, if you do not look for yourself. An under-rated, horror suspense cool. 8/10 is the most beautiful.

  3. Abraham
    May 19, 2013 at 5:55 am (472 days ago)

    I hate to say this because it’s been said a thousand times before a thousand different movies .. but here:
    The book is much better. Because this is a comment area for the film, I can only say that he tried to live in the book, but simply could not be done. I think the film failed due to merger .. Ben Affleck should not have been chosen to be in this movie. More than Affleck .. McGowen casting was horrible. The film also appeared to cut the most important parts of the book and the special effects were not aware of. Overall, I think this movie would have been nice if it was done in 2005, the special effects, it would have been much better in the end. Also, if Hollywood had not tried so hard to appeal to the young cast and Mcgowen Affleck, the film would have been much better.
    is still hope for fans Koontz, though, I’d love to see a version of “The Taking” is almost like ghosts, but with a touch of science fiction.

  4. Cora
    May 19, 2013 at 5:55 am (472 days ago)

    What kind suddenly gives Hollywood to totally ruin a good story. They have completely left side more than half of the plot. This movie could have done much better. For some reason, the television networks seem to do a better job with Dean Koontz and Hollywood movies. Most of his books have a mini-series that had to happen. It ‘hard to get all the sensations packaged in a novel by Dean Koontz in a film of 1 1/2 to 2 hours. If you liked the movie read the book as you like even more, if you do not like the movie to read the book and see what it should be.

  5. Maryellen
    May 19, 2013 at 5:55 am (472 days ago)

    Whatever the confluence of forces that were at work, when I saw “Lawrence of Arabia” I was stunned. Scanning of the desert and its complexity lone mapped completely with the inner landscape of man revealed. Lonely, sexually obsessed incompetent but determined to press for what seems certain oblivion. Later, when we learned that he is drunk is serious? and able to get the parts later? back in the iconography of the Arabian desert.
    So everything that man has for me to do is show up and reveal his broken love. One of the most appealing features of this situation is that it can not and does not want to hide, and as a performer he can not avoid being, even if the only option is junk like that movie. This movie is a mess in many ways. Sounds a little writing articles for magazines, junk supermarket iconoclastic scholar. It turns out that he is the only expert in the world that includes the ancient being who regularly decimated areas.
    Oh my God, but the thing is so bad, you do not pay any attention to the story itself and may reflect the man and what he is asked to do, which is roughly to play. (‘My Favorite Year’ this idea is taken seriously, as it is’ Club Paradise.) This is a kind of circular. In 1962 it merged with the desert and Islam. Here, fights oil-based beast coming up from the basement to destroy a city, while the army is confused evaluation
    Ted – 1 of 3. You can find something better to do with this part of your life.